Who is this choice relevant to?

If you’re looking for something strictly sugar-free

You want to serve only sprinkles that can be labelled as sugar-free, whether for yourself or your guests. So you check the ‘of which sugars’ value per 100 g, rather than relying on a claim such as ‘less sugar’.

If you want to serve something with less sugar

You want to offer chocolate sprinkles on rusks and are happy for a lower-sugar variety to still contain sugars or a sweetener.

If you’re catering for guests

As well as checking the sugars, you look at the listed allergens and, for products containing polyols, the warning about excessive consumption.

What should you look for when choosing?

When choosing chocolate sprinkles on rusks for Friday afternoon drinks, consumers may have one main priority: a strict sugar-free threshold, less sugar or knowing what they can serve their guests.

What to consider What to look for Who it matters most to
Truly sugar-free Compare the ‘of which sugars’ value per 100 g with the EU limit of no more than 0.5 g per 100 g for the ‘sugar-free’ claim. If I’m putting something out for guests who need a strictly sugar-free option, I don’t want to mistake ‘less sugar’ for sugar-free. For around 42% of consumers, this is the main priority.
Less sugar and sweeteners Read the ingredients and check the amount of polyols and the warning about excessive consumption. I want to reduce the amount of sugar, but I’m happy with some sugars and maltitol still being present. For around 33% of consumers, reducing sugar is the top priority.
Suitable for guests Check the allergens on the packaging and consider how much chocolate sprinkles you use on each rusk. When I’m sharing rusks with several guests, I want to know what I’m serving and take their preferences into account. For around 25% of consumers, suitability matters most.

Common mistakes

  • Reading ‘less sugar’ as ‘sugar-free’

    According to Albert Heijn’s product information, Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar contains 7.7 g of sugars per 100 g, while AH Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar contains 43 g per 100 g. Both are above the threshold for the EU ‘sugar-free’ claim.

    If sugar-free is essential, check the ‘of which sugars’ value per 100 g first, whatever the wording on the front of the pack.

  • Confusing sugar reduction with an unlimited portion

    Alongside 7.7 g of sugars, Albert Heijn’s product information lists 40 g of polyols per 100 g for Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles. A lower sugar value doesn’t remove the warning about excessive consumption.

    If you’re serving several rusks, consider the total amount of sprinkles you’re offering and check the information about polyols too.

  • Overlooking the warning about maltitol

    Céréal’s product information warns that excessive consumption may have a laxative effect. The Netherlands Nutrition Centre says that large amounts of polyols can cause digestive discomfort.

    Let guests read the packaging and, if you like, offer an alternative that doesn’t contain these sprinkles.

  • Assuming rusks provide iodine in the same way as bread

    The Netherlands Nutrition Centre distinguishes between bread made with baker’s salt and rusks, and states that rusks do not contain iodine.

    When serving rusks with chocolate sprinkles, don’t assume that baker’s salt in bread provides iodine.

Brands to consider

Céréal

Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar is an option if you’re looking for a substantial reduction in sugar and are happy with maltitol. It’s not for anyone who needs a strictly sugar-free product.

  • According to Albert Heijn’s product information, this variety contains 7.7 g of sugars and 40 g of polyols per 100 g. The stated 88% reduction in sugars is compared with standard dark chocolate sprinkles.
  • The product information lists soya, possible traces of milk and a warning that excessive consumption may have a laxative effect.

Albert Heijn

AH Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar is an alternative if you want less sugar than in AH Dark Chocolate Sprinkles and don’t want a sweetener in the listed ingredients.

  • Albert Heijn states that this variety has 30% less sugar than its regular dark chocolate sprinkles.
  • According to Albert Heijn, the variety contains 43 g of sugars per 100 g. Sugar is listed first in the ingredients, and milk and lactose are also listed.

Jumbo

Jumbo Milk Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar is a milk chocolate option to compare using the label information, not a sugar-free choice.

  • Jumbo’s product page lists 42.6 g of sugars per 100 g and 30% less sugar than its regular milk chocolate sprinkles.
  • Jumbo says this variety is no longer available in its online range. If you do buy it, check the packaging, including for milk and possible gluten and wheat.

Joybuy products

Related products coming soon.

Frequently asked questions

Are Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar sugar-free?

No. Albert Heijn’s product information lists 7.7 g of sugars per 100 g. Under the Annex to EU Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the ‘sugar-free’ claim for solid foods is limited to a maximum of 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g.

What does ‘88% less sugars’ mean for Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles?

According to the product information, this is a comparison with standard dark chocolate sprinkles; it doesn’t mean that the product is sugar-free. The same product information lists 7.7 g of sugars per 100 g.

Can I serve a generous amount of maltitol-containing sprinkles on several rusks?

Take the amount you’re serving into account: Céréal’s product information warns that excessive consumption may have a laxative effect. The Netherlands Nutrition Centre says that large amounts of polyols can cause digestive discomfort.

Which allergens should I check in these lower-sugar varieties?

Check the packaging of the variety you choose. The product information lists milk and lactose for AH Dark Chocolate Sprinkles, Less Sugar, and soya and possible traces of milk for Céréal Dark Chocolate Sprinkles.

Do rusks with chocolate sprinkles contain iodine from baker’s salt?

Don’t assume they do. The Netherlands Nutrition Centre says that rusks do not contain iodine; information about baker’s salt in bread cannot automatically be applied to rusks.